{"id":728,"date":"2026-06-04T15:55:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T15:55:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sotnews.agency\/?p=728"},"modified":"2026-06-04T15:55:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T15:55:40","slug":"state-actors-must-clarify-position-on-lgbtq-bill-acepa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sotnews.agency\/?p=728","title":{"rendered":"State actors must clarify position on LGBTQ+ Bill \u2014 ACEPA"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n \t<\/i> Read Time:<\/span>3 Minute, 54 Second <\/div>\n\n <\/div>


\n<\/p>\n

\n

The Executive Director of the African Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA), Dr Rasheed Draman, has called on the government and parliamentary leadership to urgently clarify their position on the recently passed Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, popularly known as the LGBTQ+ Bill, to avoid deepening public suspicion and uncertainty.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Reacting to controversies that have emerged following the bill’s passage by Parliament last Friday, Mr Draman said conflicting signals from key state actors, including the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, and President John Dramani Mahama, risked undermining public confidence in the legislative process.<\/p>\n

Speaking in an interview, he described the bill as one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in recent years, noting that it had generated strong emotions and divisions both within the country and among Members of Parliament (MPs).<\/p>\n

\u201cThe process needs to be sanitised as soon as possible so that Ghanaians will know clearly what is going on,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Growing concerns<\/h2>\n

Dr Draman said concerns had heightened after President Mahama reportedly raised procedural issues, including questions about quorum, while the Speaker also expressed surprise at the passage of the bill and announced plans to meet with parliamentary leadership on the matter.<\/p>\n

According to him, if the Speaker’s comments accurately reflected the situation, it suggested possible communication challenges within Parliament and could fuel suspicions that efforts were being made to delay or frustrate the bill.<\/p>\n

He warned that any attempt to retreat from campaign promises regarding the legislation could have political consequences.
\u201cToday’s voter is very sophisticated and does not forget easily,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Communication lapse<\/h2>\n

Commenting on the Speaker’s decision to engage parliamentary leadership, Dr Draman said the development appeared, on the face of it, to point to a communication breakdown between the Speaker and those who presided over proceedings in his absence.<\/p>\n

He, however, cautioned against drawing premature conclusions, explaining that communication challenges could occur in any institution.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat might be happening is communication breakdown and that needs to be ironed out,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Dr Draman added that the situation differed from tensions witnessed in the Eighth Parliament, stressing that the current Speaker and his First Deputy, who presided when the bill was passed, belonged to the same political party and were therefore expected to work closely together.<\/p>\n

Parliamentary mandate<\/h2>\n

On the substance of the bill, Dr Draman maintained that Parliament had the constitutional right to pass legislation, provided it did not contravene the Constitution or infringe on the rights of citizens.<\/p>\n

He said concerns raised about possible human rights implications should be carefully examined, but cautioned against actions that could stifle the growing role of private members in the legislative process.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have encouraged private members over the years to become actively involved in lawmaking, and we do not want a situation where somebody is trying to stifle this process,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

He urged political leaders to provide clarity on the way forward to prevent prolonged uncertainty over the fate of the bill.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h2>\n

The bill was reintroduced by 10 MPs from both the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) and the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC), which marked one of the few instances of bipartisan collaboration on a major social issue in recent years.<\/p>\n

On the NDC side were the MP for Ningo-Prampram, Samuel Nartey George; MP for Ho West, Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzra; MP for Krachi West, Helen Adjoa Ntoso and MP for Dadekotopon, Rita Naa Odoley Sowah.<\/p>\n

From the NPP side were MP for Assin South, Rev.John Ntim Fordjour; MP for Nalerigu\/Gambaga, Nurideen Muhammed Mummuni; MP for Old Tafo, Vincent Ekow Assafuah; MP for Gushegu, Alhassan Tampuli Sulemana; MP for Walewale, Dr Tiah Abdul Kabiru Mahama, and MP for Odotobri, Anthony Mmieh.<\/p>\n

The bill was first introduced in 2021 and was passed by Parliament in February 2024 after over three years of intense national debate and international scrutiny.<\/p>\n

However, the bill failed to secure presidential assent before the dissolution of the Eighth Parliament, leading it to lapse automatically under the country\u2019s legislative procedures.<\/p>\n

In February this year, the same group of MPs resubmitted the bill in the Ninth Parliament that restarted the legislative process until its passage last Friday.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n